Caro-Kann Defense - Finnish variation - Summary

Christer Sundqvist: Complete analysis of the Caro-Kann Defense Finnish variation

This is a summary of a massive analysis package that includes the Caro-Kann Defense - Finnish variation. I'd like to demonstrate a typical line of play in order to pique your interest in this interesting chess opening.

With a small investment from your side, I can send the entire package (1 PGN file) to your e-mail address. I use this blog to help me cope with the enormous number of draws in correspondence chess. I'm only doing it for fun, not for financial gain. I also provide you with regular updates at no additional cost. I use PayPal, MobilePay, and standard IBAN bank transfers. Please tell me how you want to receive the chess opening package. My email is turpaduunari@outlook.com.

If you believe my request for money is unethical or greedy, I am willing to consider alternative options (exchange of valuable ideas or other forms of cooperation).

I have a lot of free stuff on my page. As a matter of fact you are able to download the complete chess analysis of the Caro-Kann Defense Finnish variation here: PGN-file (130 kb)

I have used these resources:

• Chess Cloud Database Query Mode (https://www.chessdb.cn/queryc_en/) = CCD

• Chessbase software

• ICCF Games Archive (https://www.iccf.com/message?message=454 ) 1961–2026

• Opening Master Chess Database (https://www.openingmaster.com/)

• Personal chess database (approx. 90 million games)

• Stockfish 17 chess engine

• Sundqvist, Christer. The Caro-Kann Defense Finnish variation played by a strong correspondence chess player 2019-2026

• Christer Sundqvist, Kristo S. Miettinen, Tapio Heilala, Panu Laine. Caro-Kannin Suomi-muunnelma. Kirjeshakki 60 (1): 30–41, 2021

• The Week in Chess (https://theweekinchess.com/twic ) 1994–2026..]

1.e4 c6 [The Caro-Kann Defense is regarded as a reliable defensive strategy to counter the threat posed by the white king's pawn double step. The variation is appropriate for a player who wishes to improve his game quietly and defeat White's negligible advantage from the opening move. The Caro-Kann opening is not at all dull, despite what some people think.]

2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 h6 [We look at the traditional version of the Caro-Kann Defense, where Black plays h7–h6 to set up an escape square for his white-squared bishop on h7 rather than making the quick 4...Bf5 move. The Suomi (Finnish) version of the Caro-Kann Defense is a move that is rarely used. The reason for the variation's name is unknown. Naturally, many Finnish chess players have experimented with this variation. In his famous match against Eero Raaste in Espoo in 1986, the late powerful chess player Antti Pyhälä is credited with creating the variation. The correspondence chess match between Kari Tikkanen and Vladimir Loginov in the 1986–1991 Baltic Sea-themed tournament also caught our attention. According to Tapio Heilala, after reading about the variation in the Swedish magazine Shacknytt, Kari was motivated to give it a try. Antti Pyhälä may have gotten the idea from the same Swedish magazine, according to Kari Tikkanen.]

5.Nf3 [This is the most common move for White.]

[5.Bc4

In the Finnish Variation, this is White's second most frequent natural development move. The bishop's sacrifice on the weak f7–square is what White is thinking of. 

5...Bf5 This is Black's best option. The crucial e6 must be played in order to bring the bishop onto the field before the route is blocked. Now that the knight is in danger, White must either move the knight to g3 or defend it, just like Vladimir Loginov did when he played with White in Kari Tikkanen's correspondence game in 1986. 6.Qe2 White offers Black a central pawn on d4. However, capturing it with the queen gives White good compensation. 6...e6 Black has a secure pawn wall. 7.Nf3 Since the d4 pawn is now protected, this is the ideal location for the knight. 7...Nf6 a logical step in development. Black suggests exchanging knights. The exchange of knights is a step in the direction of a draw, and the Caro-Kann is regarded as a draw weapon. 8.Ng3 Bg4 Here, Kari Tikkanen deviates from the strategy underlying the move h6. Although Bg4 is a more active move than Bh7, White's attacking bishop on f1 survives in nearly all variations. Black must surrender a bishop to the white knight for the remainder of the game. The exchange is referred to as a "small quality" in some quarters. Tikkanen was defeated by Loginov after a fairly even match. 9.Be3 White keeps it open where to castle. 9...Nbd7 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3

Two bishops provide White with a slight advantage. Black's position is secure, and the knights are always able to surprise him. 11...Nb6 12.Bb3 a5 13.a3 Nbd5 14.0–0 Qb6 15.Rfe1 Be7 16.Bc1 a4 17.Ba2 Qa5 18.Re2 b5 19.Bd2 Qc7 20.Rae1 Rd8 21.c3 Kf8 22.c4 bxc4 23.Bxc4 Kg8 24.Ne4 Nxe4 25.Qxe4 Bf6 26.Rc1 Qb6 1–0 (42) Loginov Vladimir Nikolaevich (2444)-Tikkanen Kari (FIN) (2540), correspondence game, 1986; 

5.Bd3

This might be White's best move. Following the Bd3 move, the diagonal row b1–h7 becomes weaker. In the majority of variations, this is where the bishop ends up, and Black needs to consider this. This can be referred to as White's attempt to exchange the bishop for a lower price. This is White's slower, but no less successful, attempt to secure a long-term advantage. The goal is to force Black's light square bishop, also known as the Suomi bishop, into a cheap exchange, either on the squares f5 or h7, or by ruthlessly exchanging the bishop for a knight. 

5...Nf6 CCD -61 6.Nxf6+ exf6 7.Ne2 Bd6 8.0–0 0–0 9.Ng3 Re8 10.c3 Nd7 11.Bxh6 gxh6 12.Qg4+ Kh8 13.Qh5 Bf4 14.Qf5 Nf8 15.Qxf4 Kg7 16.Nh5+ 1–0 (16) turpaduunari (Christer Sundqvist) (1845)-olliy (2013) https://gameknot.com/chess.pl 2024; 

5.Ng3

White might be able to defend himself against the Bf5 move by playing proactively. Here, the goal is to prevent the Bf5–type continuations of the Caro-Kann main variation while also voluntarily moving the somewhat unsteady e4–knight in the center away. 

5...Nf6 6.Nf3 Bg4 7.Be2 e6 8.h3 Bxf3 9.Bxf3 Bd6 10.0–0 0–0 and White is free to attempt to undermine Black's powerful position, though this is by no means simple.]

5...Bf5 [The Finnish variation relies heavily on this 5...Bf5 move. However, neither 5...Bg4 nor 5...Nf6 are part of the theme.]

6.Ng3 [6.Nc5!? An intriguing move. One could argue that White made a serious effort to push Black off the board with this move. 6...Qc7 Probably the best defensive move. 7.Bd3 Bxd3 8.Nxd3 e6 9.Bf4 Bd6 10.Bxd6 Qxd6 11.Qe2 and then castling on the opposing sides, where White once more has a marginally bigger developmental advantage than the initial move. 11...Nd7 12.0–0–0 Ne7 13.Kb1 0–0–0 14.g3 Qc7 15.Rhe1 Kb8 16.c3 Rhe8 17.Qe4 Nf5 18.Nfe5 Nxe5 19.Nxe5 a6 20.Qg4 Rg8 21.a3 Nd6 22.Nd3 Nc4 23.Qe2 Nb6 24.f4 Nd7 25.Qh5 Nb6 ½–½ (41) Vega Palma,M (2325)-Heilala,T (2341) ICCF 2022; 6.Bd3 The pioneering game Raaste-Pyhälä was played in this manner. (Kirjeshakki) 6...e6 7.Bf4 Bxe4 8.Bxe4 Nf6 9.Bd3 Bd6 equal position. 10.Qd2 Bxf4 11.Qxf4 Qa5+ 12.c3 Nbd7 13.0–0 0–0 14.b4 Qd8 15.c4 a5 16.a3 Qe7 17.Qd2 b6 18.Qc3 Ra7 19.Ne5 Rc8 20.Rfe1 Qd8 21.Rad1 axb4 22.axb4 b5 23.Rc1 bxc4 24.Qxc4 Nxe5 25.dxe5 Nd5 ½–½ (42) Berg,E (2348)-Karttunen,M (2284) Oropesa del Mar 1999]

6...Bh7 [The most frequent action, according to the theme, is the Bishop's withdrawal.]

[6...g5 7.Nxf5 Qa5+ 8.c3 Qxf5 9.Bd3 Qg4 10.Rg1 Nd7 11.Qb3

White has a decisive advantage.11...Nb6 12.Ne5 Qe6 13.Qxe6 fxe6 14.Bg6+ Kd8 15.Nf7+ Kc7 16.Nxh8 Nf6 17.Nf7 Nfd7 18.f4 g4 19.f5 exf5 20.Bf4+ e5 21.dxe5 Nd5 22.Bxh6 Bxh6 23.Nxh6 Ne7 24.Bxf5 Nxf5 25.Nxf5 Nxe5 26.0–0–0 Nc4 27.Nh6 Rh8 28.Rgf1 Kb6 29.Nxg4 1–0 (29) Einarsson,O-Hein,J (1577) Ballerup 2011]

7.Bd3 [The strongest move by White.]

[7.Nh5 Nd7 8.Bc4 e6 9.0–0 Ngf6 10.Nf4 Nd5 11.Re1 N7b6 12.Bb3 Bd6 13.Ne5 0–0 14.Qg4 Bf5 15.Qf3 Qh4 16.Bd2 Bxe5 17.dxe5 Nxf4 18.Bxf4 Nd5 19.Bg3 Qg4 20.Qxg4 Bxg4 21.f3 Bf5 22.Rad1 Rfd8 23.Bf2 b6 24.Rd2 Kf8 25.Red1 Ke8 1–0 (64) Geske,J (2181)-Pogan,N (1969) playchess.com INT 2008]

7...Bxd3 8.Qxd3 e6 9.0–0 Nf6 10.Re1 [10.Ne5 Nbd7 11.f4 Bd6 12.Bd2 0–0

Black is OK. 

13.Rae1 c5 14.c3 Rc8 15.f5 cxd4 16.Nxd7 Qxd7 17.fxe6 fxe6 18.cxd4 Bc5 19.Bc3 Rcd8 20.Rd1 Qa4 21.Kh1 Ng4 22.Ne4 Rxf1+ 23.Rxf1 Bxd4 24.h3 Ne3 25.Rf3 Qd1+ 26.Qxd1 Nxd1 ½–½ (33) Stockfelt,J (1473)-Piiroinen,T (1878) Finland 2016]

10...Be7 11.Bf4 [11.Bd2 0–0 12.Rad1 c5 13.Bc3 Nbd7 14.dxc5 Nxc5 15.Qc4 Qc7 16.Be5 Qc6 17.Nd4 Qa4 18.Qxa4 Nxa4 19.Nb5 a6 20.Nd6 b5 21.b3 Nb6 22.c4 bxc4 23.bxc4 Bxd6 24.Bxd6 Rfc8 25.c5 Nc4 0–1 (59) Kokkila,T (2298)-Lahdelma,H (2331) Finland FIN 2024]

11...Nbd7 12.c4 0–0 13.h3 [13.Qb3 Qb6 14.Qxb6 axb6 15.a3 Rfe8 16.Rac1 Bf8 17.h3 g5 18.Be3 Bg7 19.Red1 Red8 20.Rc2 Ra5 21.Kf1 Ne8 22.Re1 Ra4 23.Bd2 Nc7 24.Bc1 Re8 25.b3 Ra5 ½–½ (80) Araujo,H (2184)-Azevedo Junior,J (2056) Recife 2012; 13.Rad1 Re8 14.Ne5 Nxe5 15.dxe5 Qxd3 16.Rxd3 Nh7 17.Ne4 Nf8 18.Be3 Red8 19.Red1 b6 20.f4 c5 21.Kf2 Ng6 22.g3 Kf8 23.Kf3 h5 24.Nc3 Rxd3 25.Rxd3 Rd8 ½–½ (36) Anwesh,U (2408)-Deviatkin,A (2580) Mumbai 2011]

13...Re8 14.a3 [14.Rad1 Qb6 15.Qc2 c5 16.dxc5 Bxc5 17.Ne5 Nxe5 18.Bxe5 Red8 19.Bxf6 gxf6 20.a3 a5 21.Nh5 Bd4 22.Rd2 Rac8 23.b3 f5 24.Red1 Qc5 25.Kh1 a4 ½–½ (42) Popov,V (2138)-Dziedzic,A (2143) ICCF email 2016]

14...a5 

15.b3 Qb6 16.c5 Qb5 17.Qxb5 cxb5 18.b4 axb4 19.axb4 Ra4 20.Rxa4 bxa4 21.Ra1 Nd5 22.Bd2 b5 23.Ne5 Nxe5 24.dxe5 Bg5 25.Be1 Bf4 26.Ne4 Bxe5 27.Rc1 Bb2 28.Rd1 a3 29.Nd6 Ra8 [0–1 (29) olliy (2046)-turpaduunari (Christer Sundqvist) (2603) https://gameknot.com/chess.pl 2025]